Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:20:15 GMT From: Mykhaylo Yehorov <yehorov@gmail.com> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: usb/164090: [umodem] [patch] Add sysctl with ucom unit number Message-ID: <201201141020.q0EAKFUa092944@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR usb/164090; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mykhaylo Yehorov <yehorov@gmail.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/164090: [umodem] [patch] Add sysctl with ucom unit number Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:51:07 +0200 On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 22:54, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > Could you patch ucom_set_pnpinfo_usb() instead, so that such a sysctl is > created for all ucom devices, not only umodem? I guess it will be necessary to remove a sysctl oid from a parent sysctl tree before destroying ucom structures. It's would be better to do in ucom_detach() but now there is no a pointer to a parent device structure from there. Now all drivers that use ucom pass a pointer to parent softc structure to ucom_attach(). Is there any reason for this? May be it's would be more useful to pass a pointer to a parent device structure. > Can you explain a bit more how you use this information in your scripts? I've got a gps receiver and a mobile phone that supported by the umodem driver. I can attach its in any order. So I use sysctl to generate gpsd and ppp configs with appropriate values of serial port. -- Mykhaylo Yehorov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201141020.q0EAKFUa092944>