From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 16:38:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6328916D7B for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3C719F4 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6805E20988 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=X6IWPXlxfzokb7Y aPt9aexjEPtg=; b=SZS1tcocSna4/GNMCXMHvh1ON6B6pnVxfSjqdumutuPnPQ8 7nF85ybDkIIy3lASfi1iCHDOHV09L2Zj7hkYhFgcDNSyl2nUbZ6gT26WN+vYyYyz f9dKnBYtD00ZkxQBXxvKskJQXMDD40yXc4loyfLs49we0RL8x3nmOXJWweZk= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 447601043F2; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1435163885.1004254.306704961.62F7F38C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 005EXfSL0sh8nwncg8NA7CyM+Jz+sBvPmtG1RQ5YYkH0 1435163885 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-eecef38c Subject: Re: can the l2arc memory leak fix be pulled into 10.1-RELEASE ? Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:38:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5588173C.30608@byte.nl> References: <5588173C.30608@byte.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:38:06 -0000 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015, at 09:10, Daniel Genis wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > we're currently running 10.1-RELEASE, but are encountering the l2arc > memory leak which got resolved in 10.1-STABLE r274172, maybe we need > r275609 also (as discussed here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197164). > > We are kind of new to FreeBSD, so we're wondering what are the plans to > merge these fixes into the 10.1-RELEASE branch ? > > We'd love to get these fixes without having to rebuild the kernel. > Is there any chance for the merge to happen in the near future, or > should we compile the kernel to get the fixes? > > Thanks for you help! > > With kind regards, > > Daniel > Wasn't this fixed in the following EN? https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs.asc If so, it should be solved if you're running 10.1-RELEASE-p11