From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 6 22:37:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721F51065672; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com (mail-pz0-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4319D8FC16; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so10446811pzk.7 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:37:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bzZxMNNVaho42IX4tXU/zd+VWU4yqtOI+0QmGe7vjlg=; b=R+q01t4RPavcEezdmZK9m/jDW8+at3b+AK24a89oSGVk8DMNkiOV/MF7nNZLaNC1Mt yI82sKKhUAFZzc09BY6hCMAtWlARBcbP3CB7QL96Rd+MKj1TIv2BjUjPMAqLFnCdJ/oV JAi1UZzzXV0pGmbD91MMBbKye4pLcfk0QdzDk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=K9R6sUUz0afiVVVaPWhBGKVB2FjDtxSlc9AxEm8m6s3nAda9J2FyiK6ColcQMmbt/k 5KM1KmuJoK9HqBfvN8AId2Agd5W5kSxYnckBj0GpQlRZ+K5s7IroHyW5sn7MkEfnhwTr 1bj81eZB9DlfE5rjK6CBtaA9IikZUyQRqhp0Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.242.8 with SMTP id p8mr1523545wah.169.1262817445650; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:37:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:37:25 -0800 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: Matt Reimer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-fs , Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: PATCH: teach (gpt)zfsboot, zfsloader to discern vdev status correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:37:29 -0000 Hi, Matt, On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Matt Reimer wrote: > Would one of you be able to review this patch and commit it if it's > acceptable? This is the same patch I submitted last month. The patch looks fine to me. By the way, I think the patch has raised TEMP_SIZE from 128K to 1MB, how was the number being chosen? Cheers, -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net