Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 10:45:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254443] x11-wm/pekwm - update WWW in pkg-descr Message-ID: <bug-254443-7788-2biwrf5HSZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-254443-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-254443-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254443 Natacha Port=C3=A9 <natbsd@instinctive.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(natbsd |maintainer-feedback+ |@instinctive.eu) | --- Comment #1 from Natacha Port=C3=A9 <natbsd@instinctive.eu> --- I'm fine with the patch, and thanks a lot for letting me know about the new site :-) I will soon be spending time with the new pekwm version, checking that the = port actually works with it and it's fine for daily use, then I'll update the po= rt (unless someone else beats me to it). At this point I'm not sure exactly what I should do, regarding the FreeBSD = port process, and I can't find much documentation regarding maintainer's role. I think the above is enough feedback for warrant `maintainer-feedback +` (please correct me if I'm wrong), I'm aware that at some point I should add `mainatainer-approval +` but I can't find its exact semantics (am I suppose= d to check that it builds first? or even run it on my machine?). Any documentation pointer that I can re-use for the other ports that I "maintain" (they are unpopular stable ports, so I'm not spending much time = on it, hence my ignorance) will be very appreciated. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-254443-7788-2biwrf5HSZ>