From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 04:46:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75128C7; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89164365; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA34PbKH024525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 21:25:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sA34Pbum024495; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 21:25:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 21:25:37 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: John Subject: Re: gptboot: invalid backup GPT header In-Reply-To: <20141103014341.GA91255@potato.growveg.org> Message-ID: References: <20141101224426.GA69717@potato.growveg.org> <20141103014341.GA91255@potato.growveg.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:25:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:46:36 -0000 On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, John wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 07:15:59AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: >> Clearing the last blocks will remove the warning, at least if the >> assumption is correct. ZFS is not supposed to be using the last >> portion of the disk(*) to make replacing disks of slightly different >> sizes easier. Still, I would back up either the whole array, the >> whole disk, or at least the last 33 blocks of mfid1 first. > > Thanks for replying. So, in short - is my data on the array in any > danger, or is this just a cosmetic issue? If the guess is correct, it's just cosmetic. Unless someone panics at the warning and tries to repair it.