Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:13:49 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> To: Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com> Cc: Michael Grant <mg-fbsd3@grant.org> Subject: Re[2]: iSCSI and clustering with FreeBSD Message-ID: <69186061515.20030617211349@buz.ch> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0306171153070.17577-100000@walnut.he.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0306171153070.17577-100000@walnut.he.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Kip, Tuesday, June 17, 2003, 9:05:53 PM, you wrote: >> goes down. I'd probably do this with NAT or an ip tunnel. This >> second box almost makes it seem not worthwhile to put the other boxes >> in different ISPs. Anyone have better ideas? > I'm sure some of the ASPs must have solved that problem. The ASPs usually run their own, DB backed code and thus can count on the DB to replicate itself, no? Or Akamai have mostly static stuff they can just rsync or so... Best regards, Gabriel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQEVAwUBPu9aY8Za2WpymlDxAQGejQgAhzRtXCNM8QQGDfPBefaTlw0ksqA1x+yU 3BOyTchUuUM/k3P8nPw0Gu0Y9lv7BECJ0Qgh7NMXM6XmNby2m4s75jOP+X/Q7V9e BCVWaGxOss4qmtFzt5afsdpB+ADivFJoUJt0QXNohR0EHBDeEmAIaWhQOwqYxQFk Peu3fNbS51mhyBtbsMlMeAV26jYcqyaySATn0Rd7IF5kJwHfylNAAaIXDsDGqEXT IGsDzm5wiw+Ppu0NG7x4XcAZHuRC3QddlP6X+megPKWagQCbtSNBeCjk5ULysjGc hFdcI5Gcw8fUGGwt50WBT3BuUCBDn3lRPd20BrWksn1EYiYy3Y66NQ== =1R0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69186061515.20030617211349>