Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 22:43:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: source code layout? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980419223700.523x-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980419191215.14900F-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Apr 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:
> what is tce?
> PCI is independent of i386. the MACS have PCI and so do some SGI's I
> believe, (and possibly some SUNs too)
So which drivers in sys/pci compile against those targets? IMHO until a
driver has been compiled and ported to a specific arch we shouldn't be
mis-filing them in sys/pci.
sys/i386/pci should work just fine.
Actually, I'd really like to see
sys/bus/{isa,eisa,pci}
sys/i386/{isa,eisa,pci}
sys/pc98/{isa,eisa,pci}
...
Which would reduce the amount of divergence to support arch dependent
bits.
I'm sure the PC98 guys would be able to express how much they would enjoy
not having to constantly pull up their files to -current.
NetBSD does have its problems but they've taken steps towards resolving
some of these issues.
/*
Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life
winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53
*/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980419223700.523x-100000>