From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 19 18:14:52 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4401065678;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AB48FC0C;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0JIDYLS077387;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:13:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:14:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20090119.111407.-1037166918.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: joel@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4974AE57.80005@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20090119112333.GA36305@freebsd.weongyo.org>
	<4974AE57.80005@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: urtw(4) to be committed soon
X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB <freebsd-usb.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:14:52 -0000

In message: <4974AE57.80005@FreeBSD.org>
            Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> writes:
: Well, the FreeBSD project uses the following license:

While this is the preferred license for the project, core@ published a
license policy for files in the three last year or the year before.
The ISC license, which was posted but I've cropped for my reply, is
one of the ones on that list.  While it may be preferable to have the
license that Joel quoted, there's nothing wrong with the ISC license.

Warner