From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:18:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92867DA7; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60948FC0A; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c50so1596803eek.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:18:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bwZ87O4zHw0CHDqwuMDjtxPu720yPqTJXFWIxHhfx7Q=; b=vT3F9F3CSVlt3tiEnNucYyZFaN5CC83UlIc6/58imhGiC7kClrnUjmRFs075k5BOmz 2Iw3k3J1Kln8s6PxgwUc38HKPzw7mZ0RU7ycI/ORQpVWXHI3a2iu0CW6bn4sh0tEqtQb pqewPy1dkw2YbWAZ5yIfUD6eTwD233vxxEcC+iyNBdjhIT4dXdk+ovnn/wMcP8N+geUJ urtBw/dhMI7m3Tz6aYmO/jTWkwZSBDZfzpX8JbB5LDP1FeSCg20KSvVPzwYcIKCHKIl6 uCpfKGnjgYMo9Z/nd07CYZka8H1h5MGwtijBYfmeuNz7Dtkh5YQtpsTFjlVyUQ68FUUD nmxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.194.72 with SMTP id l48mr21319348een.9.1352333920981; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.66.194 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:18:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <15C29F34-C400-4578-95EF-9708FAC2AF0F@FreeBSD.org> References: <201211070106.qA716QhS013858@fire.js.berklix.net> <15C29F34-C400-4578-95EF-9708FAC2AF0F@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:18:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1-RC3 feels okay :-) From: Kevin Oberman To: David Chisnall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Warren Block , Ian Lepore , "Julian H. Stacey" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, CeDeROM X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:18:48 -0000 On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:35 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 7 Nov 2012, at 08:20, Warren Block wrote: > >> It's not saying that hald is run by default, merely that xorg-server will try to use it by default. > > And will fail to detect any input devices if hald is not running, but will correctly detect them if the X server is compiled without HAL support. Please can we fix the defaults for xorg-server to do the sensible thing? i believe I saw that this was fixed yesterday. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com