From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 18 12:21:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E2716A4DE for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from novel@smtp.hispeed.ch) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948C743D67 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from novel@smtp.hispeed.ch) Received: from coredump.fannet.ru (R1-Vl6-82-116-56-21.fannet.ru [82.116.56.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.6/taifun-1.0) with ESMTP id k7ICLAC9016454; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:21:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:21:38 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20060818122138.GF78016@underworld.novel.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Jeremy , ports@freebsd.org References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817082940.GB845@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060817082940.GB845@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> X-PGP: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/novel.key.asc X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on smtp-07.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-02.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-07.tornado.cablecom.ch 1378; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:21:13 -0000 --0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter Jeremy wrote: >=20 > There are severe logistical problems: Ports are currently expected to > build for at least 3 different src branches, with between 2 and 6 > different architectures in each. Multiply this by over 15,000 ports > and that process isn't going to work. And this ignores interactions Yeah, that's the problem we should find a solution for. > between port versions - you often can't upgrade a port in isolation > but need to have consistent revisions. That's not a problem, IMO. > >If both conditions are meat, the commit may be backported to STABLE. >=20 > How long are you going to wait for this? What happens if the commit > to HEAD works ok on some architecture/branches and not others? Debian uses 10 days or so. I think we could use something simular, 1-2 weeks or so. And about some specific arch issue, I think we should care about i386/amd64 first. --0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBROWw0oB0WzgdqspGAQIgTwP+NcW/g5ErIjm80nZgAHUYd8pjIf37hXdT Ui/4MGzEuYM2ryPsx+w7YPkihiSpXpU1x8+83uxmzB4PgzeMw0ezFZydmWXWxsTu qTzhTFlF/MZsznQ9k/75XmEs5IJqPSBZQwBXP2doH4fgTOfmFmk6/hNF1Nfk7/CB jfndJOP/XPE= =2vDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a--