From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 22:29:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249BB106564A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86E38FC1B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CB2582E8; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:29:40 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id URnBAeF-+uS1; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:29:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (i3-dhcp-172-16-223-126.icecube.wisc.edu [172.16.223.126]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D778B582E7; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:29:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E600753.4030400@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:29:39 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Thyer References: <24B9852A-8DE4-4BC6-9B55-2D74E414E31D@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Warren Block , Garrett Cooper , Jason Campbell , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.0-BETA1 memstick X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:29:41 -0000 On 09/01/11 17:23, Matt Thyer wrote: > On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, "Warren Block" wrote: >> >> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote: >>> >>>> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image > ? > >> It seems wrong to have gptboot just ignore backup GPT data, but it could > be an option. Can it actually do something if the backup GPT differs, or is > it testing for an error that can't be handled? >> >> MBR didn't have backup data ("Luxury! Pure luxury!"), and it did okay. > > A custom hacked gptboot just for the memstick? > > Sorry.... Been working with Linux too much lately. > > Probably the real solution is to use MBR and have BSDinstall and the install > kernel support UFS labels. Space on the memstick is not an issue. Both support that. The issue is makefs(8). -Nathan