From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 07:46:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0BF16A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:46:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474DD43D53; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:46:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L7kwsj001750; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8L7kwog001749; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:46:58 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040921074658.GB1368@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200409201934.i8KJYfcS036447@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040921.054126.07648742.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org> <200409201753.18974.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040920180603.6dc01457@localhost> <20040920180128.W21773@pooker.samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040920180128.W21773@pooker.samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Tom Rhodes cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org cc: John Baldwin cc: Hiroki Sato cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:46:59 -0000 On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 06:03:59PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:53:18 -0400 > > This was already fought over several weeks ago, and we decided that since > NetBSD, OpenBSD, and a number of Linux's use 'amd64' in their > documentation that we would also. I _thought_ that we also agreed to > mention 'EM64T' and 'IA32e' in the same context to clarify what we support > since there have been a number of questions about this from end users. It was not my understanding that everywhere "AMD64" was mentioned, we would also mention "EM64T". Our FreeBSD/AMD64 release notes and HARDWARE docs, and http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html is the place to document that Intel calls it "EM64T" or "IA32e". -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)