From owner-cvs-lib Sun Apr 19 21:51:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA20002 for cvs-lib-outgoing; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 21:51:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-lib) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA19644; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 04:50:16 GMT (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA04754; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:46:33 +1000 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:46:33 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199804200446.OAA04754@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, dag-erli@ifi.uio.no Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys lseek.2 src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, des@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >OK, I'm backing out vfs_syscalls.c and lseek.2. > >> I replied to the PR, but for some reason the followup didn't get attached >> to the PR. > >If it's not a bug, shouldn't the PR have been closed with a "it's not >a bug, it's a feature" comment? Yes. But not by me. Bruce