From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 07:49:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE36916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:49:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F2543D2F for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005032807491211200m93vue>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:49:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4247B6F7.8010508@att.net> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:49:11 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions References: <20050328044052.75667.qmail@web53909.mail.yahoo.com> <42479915.5040202@att.net> <200503272151.29109.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200503272151.29109.ringworm01@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:49:14 -0000 Michael C. Shultz wrote: > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information > on the various options. > > here is an example: > > # all-depends-list > # - Show all directories which are dependencies > # for this port. > > then > > cd /usr/ports/lang/ezm3/ > make all-depends-list > > result: > > /usr/ports/converters/libiconv > /usr/ports/devel/gettext > /usr/ports/devel/gmake > /usr/ports/devel/libtool15 > > -Mike > Mike, That's great info, thank you. It really helps put this into perspective. I did portmanager -sl and it identifies 7 candidates for deletion. It identifies cvsup-without-gui and also identifies ezm3 upon which it depends. Am I missing something here or shouldn't ezm3 not been identified as a "leaf port"? Jay