From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 21:06:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50968E24 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2A78FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq7so2428870wib.1 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:06:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1htEXF7fUpzzn5yidvDMteW0wjJ0OxMSd17WeRDr+54=; b=H+kAiZP7tEg1SN4eCZEqWl92lH8Cz4++ICjde5luO3lH/ZW46X9Bl32vFeUQn8M7Vl 8YgbYW4WWYE66mkDqT5M+ueVdvhZKlKR/Hwj4k9VsAIkInbPdmgz176Uefkvql3iwjgT 3SKFrOWzwLHmEZxnKLTuCNN33xjfX6dgXfx63yIDZ7BjkPUhZKPWMOmU4gyufX2azv89 uZCMFtVdug1iVsj0eD2au6vHmqVKUCAYiQGzxNGm53K1Am3wiytS+BSKYC84Ufc8LXIt MsjbTe2xJ/KLEPG0OwkjS0esTWX9vHMo7SvlGtcvXeHI1tLmQ5oUBxu7ZKptyI0WSQE1 s+4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.102.101 with SMTP id fn5mr18972264wib.19.1355260016664; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:06:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:06:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:06:56 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bq9tNHC9TCs7dpYDyJT_I2kFIyw Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11n in adhoc mode From: Adrian Chadd To: PseudoCylon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:06:58 -0000 Hm, you may be right; but I disabled HT protection entirely and stuck it on a very quiet channel. It's possible both ends were colliding with each other though. I did add some HT update code to the adhoc beacon processing, though. It's just not entirely clear how to handle that given the nature of IBSS - ie, every peer may have some different idea of what the protection mode is. It's possible that it should be learnt once when you join the BSS, much like how the adhoc scan pick code checks for a few things matching before it joins that BSS. Adrian