From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:54:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B81065672 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D758FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so401498ywp.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:54:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SmCebj4OS43n9ohTaCctCyzpA2fwZnLLlFknfnfHaKI=; b=DWdOUra/TI6KpdMXHBze3XYs+SPY+vgA7BOlithdIlFDX1CoH3XifmuwjUWRepSAB2 Y0rKgbIe9qXlrF8DdhpUAM/es0b2dST7RuoehwnE4NZizz0UnxkTNjNjzCB//g0kWLzM UFsdc8GiaFxlLiD8wa0ufa14pPCMs38mkMiF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ARoTcWSpE2b7gbLn9kHmGfcGW8OkLnybtsdQn8zZgDP0QeDyr3S29yDk+8mcAY37xt 06zjB+2IWoI1LaR3L8HtDeQJM7HtN0IscvDfMwm4V+ZGaDzVcfedMDPgjq4CmGldBY3k 19RWUmZdxOg34p43moYUb58Z8ADRVBEGmuvDg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.203.6 with SMTP id f6mr2446970agq.30.1292603237526; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.111.11 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:27:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: jackoroses@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:36 -0000 On 17 December 2010 10:36, Mike L wrote: > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. Here, let me re-iterate for those that may not have a copy of what you're saying is unacceptable in front of them: o we're aware there's talk about some projects possibly having been compromised a decade ago o we have ports of those projects in our project o the code that ends up in FreeBSD from those other projects rarely resembles the original project's code o in the porting process, bugs may unintentionally be introduced or removed o bugs present in the upstream project may not be found in FreeBSD's version o people are welcome and encouraged to look at the FreeBSD code, provide fixes and/or decide for themselves if they want to use it What more do you want them to say? How is this is not a perfectly reasonable response? Cutting security-officer@ out because I'm pretty sure Colin reads this list. kmw