From owner-cvs-all Thu Nov 30 5:41:42 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.mk.bsdclub.org (t57.htmnet.ne.jp [202.248.65.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FCE37B401; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 05:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (sakura.mk.bsdclub.org [3ffe:505:2022:0:2a0:c9ff:fe20:9aff]) by mail.mk.bsdclub.org (8.11.0+3.3W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.07) with ESMTP/inet6 id eAUDetY93424; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:40:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (localhost.mk.bsdclub.org [127.0.0.1]) by sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (8.11.1/3.7W) with ESMTP/inet id eAUDetc82232; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:40:55 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200011301340.eAUDetc82232@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Motoyuki Konno , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/imake-4/scripts configure From: Motoyuki Konno X-Mailer: mh-e on Mule 2.3 / Emacs 19.34.1 References: <200011291208.eATC8K274350@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001130150829.A9269@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:40:55 +0900 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Add Cc: ports Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 04:08:20AM -0800, Motoyuki Konno wrote: > > motoyuki 2000/11/29 04:08:20 PST > > > > Modified files: > > devel/imake-4/scripts configure > > Log: > > Add "#define BuildAoutLibraries ${BuildAoutLibraries}". > > > > This variable is declared in port Makefile. > > > > Submitted by: motoyuki > > Reviewed by: maintainer > > Reference: [ports-jp 10459],[ports-jp 10464] > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.4 +3 -0 ports/devel/imake-4/scripts/configure > > Does this warrant a PORTREVISION bump? Hmm. The default value of ${BuildAoutLibraries} is "NO" (see imake config file which will be installed into /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config). and port Makefil). So, my commit does NOT change the behaviour of imake-4 package. # If you build this port with "make BuildAoutLibraries=YES package", # the package will differ. So, I think PORTREVISION bump is not needed. Is my idea wrong? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Motoyuki Konno motoyuki@bsdclub.org (Home) motoyuki@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Project) http://www.freebsd.org/~motoyuki/ (WWW) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message