Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:30:16 +0200 From: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" Message-ID: <20110624103016.GA71991@x2.osted.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110623202153.GS48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> <20110623202153.GS48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Does anyone object to this patch? > > > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > > years with no problems. > > > > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > > TMPFS either. > > > > > > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > > =================================================================== > > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > > @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > > return EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > > > > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > > - > > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > > error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); > > The things I am aware of: > - there is a races on the lookup. They were papered over in r212305, > but the bug was not really fixed, AFAIR. > > - the tmpfs does double-buffering for the mapped vnodes. This is quite > insulting for the memory-backed fs, isn't it ? I have a patch, but it is > still under review. > > - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He > would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on execve(2) the > binary located on tmpfs. > I ran the TMPFS tests I have and so far I only spotted the mmap(2) problem: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/tmpfs/ > Removing the warning will not make the issues coming away. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk4DoGEACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j9wwCg0V37VuQUw5heAl/Z/iAlO+h0 > SmAAoJf/+BF533SS0hUjGsscsSAqUApX > =5GKO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110624103016.GA71991>