From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 21 12:32:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA26011 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA26004 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:32:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA21272; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:32:07 -0800 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 12:32:07 -0800 Message-Id: <199602212032.MAA21272@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: pgf@american.com CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199602211339.IAA23469@hotsprings.american.com> (message from Paul Fox on Wed, 21 Feb 1996 08:39:18 -0500) Subject: Re: zlib 0.95 disappeared from master site From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * satoshi -- what's the correct protocol for this? i put a patch for a * similar upgrade to vile/xvile in incoming on freefall some time ago (and * sent mail to the list), but nothing has happened with it. i've been * keeping the old version of vile (5.2) available at the master site, until * i'm sure the ports tree is updated. of course, the ports tree would get * updated more quickly if i simply removed the old version, because then it * would break, and someone would fix it. :-) Actually, it will help a lot if you can keep the old version until the *release* with the new version ships. That would be around August.... ;) * what should i be doing differently? i spoke to justin (i think) at usenix * about it, and he suggested that i just get an account on freefall. while * i'm happy to do that, it seems like overkill, since this kind of release * number upgrade would be my only involvement... Sorry, you are doing nothing wrong, your message just showed up when I was horrendously busy and nobody else picked it up. Will look at it as soon as possible. By the way, if you want to do the maintenance yourself, I have no problem at all creating an account for you, who can be a better maintainer than the author himself! :) Satoshi