From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 03:08:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D7C16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832B143D46; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:08:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AfdSV-0000J3-02; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:43 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Gib5+4ZpYefNid2RHt0M4Eddr0rQhRFC6FkWxtgXGbclkR56HZ4900@[217.83.16.40]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AfdS2-1a4gUK0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:14 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i0BB87Jb020539; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0BB8P51006557; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:24 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-Id: <20040111120824.00cb6314@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040111051649.GK7617@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <40007D14.6090205@freebsd.org> <3180.1073776377@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040111051649.GK7617@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Gib5+4ZpYefNid2RHt0M4Eddr0rQhRFC6FkWxtgXGbclkR56HZ4900@t-dialin.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:21:34 -0800 cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame and Vinum (was: Future of RAIDFrame) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:08:46 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:46:49 +1030 "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: > Hmm. I can't see why they have to disappear from the source tree, and > I don't see why Scott or I should have to look the other way. I don't > know about RAIDFrame, but Vinum still works for the most part: [...] > > In the p4 tree, we can easier add new talent to our developer force > > and I am pretty sure that some sort of merry band of developers > > would form around both RF and vinum there. > > OK, I'm not a fan of p4, but I suspect that's not the issue. This > sounds like a way of suggesting "Let's do VinumNG and RFNG and get a > whole lot of people involved". I couldn't agree more. [...] > > I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants > > their hands have a go at them. > > For some definition of perforce, I'm all for it. Note that there's > also an OS-independent mailing list (see > http://www.auug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/vinum-devel for joining > instructions). I'm a little bit confused. I've read Pouls mail as an suggestion to remove vinum from -current and let people modify it in the perforce repository. If I got this wrong, please tell me and everything is fine, but if I got it right, do you (Greg) agree to remove it from -current? Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7