From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 17 16: 5:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from envy.geekhouse.net (envy.geekhouse.net [64.81.6.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59A437B402; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jim@localhost) by envy.geekhouse.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0I05US71169; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:05:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:05:30 -0800 From: Jim Mock To: Matthew Emmerton Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, dirk@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A Newer OpenSSL Port? Message-ID: <20010117160530.A71104@envy.geekhouse.net> Reply-To: jim@geekhouse.net References: <007701c080c7$34b9e860$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i In-Reply-To: <007701c080c7$34b9e860$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>; from matt@gsicomp.on.ca on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:50:55PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 at 15:50:55 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > I'm running 4.1-REL, and am working on porting the SRP implementation > from Stanford. > > Their implementation of SRP relies on openssl-0.9.6. According to > what I see in /usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h, the OpenSSL that ships > with 4.1-REL is 0.9.4. > > Upgrading to 4.2-REL won't help as it ships with 0.9.5a, which still > isn't good enough. Upgrade to -STABLE. It has 0.9.6. - jim -- jim mock work: jim@osd.bsdi.com | jim@FreeBSD.org http://soupnazi.org/ BSDi Open Source Div | http://bsdi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message