From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 22:03:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11AB16A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:03:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA0643D45 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@irotas.net) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com (web3.internal [10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455D5C76131 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 524633074; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:03:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1113602621.27083.231994991@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: T0nupWKzzdFYKoGu8/o48VIQZZjc/gll0vRIIdIjwznI 1113602621 From: "Adam McLaurin" To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.001; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1933346976.20050122135540@klax.tula.ru> <20050122131231.GB823@zaphod.nitro.dk> <425FB8E7.4000707@ion.lu> <20050415215130.GC776@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20050415215130.GC776@zaphod.nitro.dk> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:03:41 -0400 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: wget-1.8.2_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:03:42 -0000 Hi Simon, I'm just curious why we are hanging on to Wget 1.8.x as we are. The Wget website clearly states "The latest stable version of Wget is 1.9.1.". In fact, we don't even have the 1.9.x line in ports (ftp/wget is 1.8.x, ftp/wget-devel is 1.10.x). Why not bring ftp/wget up to 1.9.x ? Thanks, Adam On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:51:30 +0200, "Simon L. Nielsen" said: > As flz said, wgetpro is also affected by the vulnerabilities, I don't > know the other ones. > > The new wget 1.10alpha1 and newer aren't affected, so I just updated > VuXML to state this. Note that I haven't tried the new wget, so I > don't know how stable etc. it is, but it might be with a try (it's the > ftp/wget-devel port at the moment). > > -- > Simon L. Nielsen