From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 6 08:20:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28814E3059C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1C74844 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 105EAE3059B; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFDCE3059A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38FF74843; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id 409F31DB46; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:20:26 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Steve Kargl Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" Subject: Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc Message-ID: <20171006082025.msfyxzia3muf7lfp@ivaldir.net> References: <20171004161649.GA51883@mail.michaelwlucas.com> <20171004171518.GA22519@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171006074128.gg76cd72u7wxybd3@ivaldir.net> <20171006081342.GA34314@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lezj6ys54hljdg7r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171006081342.GA34314@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:20:27 -0000 --lezj6ys54hljdg7r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:13:42AM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:15:18PM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do simple > > > > poudriere installs, but once you start covering it properly the docs > > > > quickly expand. My notes alone are longer than my af3e chapter > > > > limits. (I'll probably publish "FreeBSD Packaging Misery^WMastery" = in > > > > 2018). > > >=20 > > > Please include a discussion on how to use poudriere on > > > a system with limited resouces (e.g., 10 GB of free > > > diskspace and less than 1 GB free memory). I know > > > portmaster works well [1] within an environment with > > > only 4 GB free diskspace and 1 GB memory. > > >=20 > > > [1] portmaster worked well prior to portmgr's decision > > > to displace simple small tools in favor of a sledge > > > hammer. > >=20 > > FUD.. portmgr never took any decision like this. > > The problem with portmaster (beside some design flows regarding > > the "not build in a clean room") is that it is not maintained anymore. > > (Note that it has never been maintained by portmgr at all). >=20 > I'm well aware of Doug Barton's history with FreeBSD. You > can paint it with whatever color you want. >=20 > If you (and other poudriere) contributors stated that flavors/subpackages > would not be supported by poudriere, would flavors/subpackages been > wedged into the ports build infrastructure? Yes because if you look at mailing lists etc, you ould have figured out that this is the number one feature requested in the ports tree for years. Also yes we would have make sure that the tools used to build official pack= ages would have worked with it, prior poudriere it was tinderbox. And again we are giving time (and warning in advance) for all the tools to = catch up! Best regards, Bapt --lezj6ys54hljdg7r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAlnXPMcACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlrIuw//UU7kYiZJCO1WkYvyK4ULSWyTL+alGIHzEumds2p8kqWrbNgGJk0qFIbk ZW0UwHoHqK9bJGF7VdmbCUsHtb6JhipJH/8L8X/XXIfDJqX0xUXCClVcPENJOf4/ KzhmAQfSB83SWPML9urFUZ0cxmVJ7p3VuQVRANZblRoejtDkNf6wrnHRQqROjv0E Cf9a61/flfboEXbtEmjTKpsxiGdyKTdl8ySpIkx57vxN/MgVUFl9pDpvSPd+vKBI UEzqQS9LWxYD/oHpVsxnfSI7GgOMLarsIIOMbcK6DSh1DBvFGDK93KNDO9xzkepx UUPkJOjMs6WDGHEBS+05oL8BzkOyf9ULcRLdYGwos4LDZOZKpC1NqX7e+JnwGFe/ kDVuxZ1uFxUkEl5qwaXy+zntgNbhg+c/o1xv3s/qGLeiuw9Lo80q5Ulxryd8kWLq j4C+0B2Io9vHqvM6VTQQM6uECbAcG4D7vre1QI9Po668g1N1x8lAF3dZlu26EaUN LGUSNq29IlHcHzdE9ITamC+YSwXB7Cdc6XdUicUr6+AAHawtvgqgwRtYu9QNNbv2 M9PGCHjGRn/UZfYxC/sJz/ishkQF2uxSWjgVkLz0e+YUpLnst8hyP22H/6OjPeMC 86gO0ObzDkvPBzCphXMrm48MnrKQum9uQKafNWUARsaoikc0PkM= =ElS0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lezj6ys54hljdg7r--