From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Jun 12 11:51:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C8C100680C; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053E07ED60; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id EEB1022278; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:05 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Warner Losh Cc: Devin Teske , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Kyle Evans , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers Subject: Re: svn commit: r334939 - head/stand/lua Message-ID: <20180612115105.GB75210@FreeBSD.org> References: <201806110132.w5B1WI5d094546@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:06 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:07:23AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > The last articulated plan in arch@ was that LUA will be default in 12, and > we plan to remove FORTH in 13. Last time I said it there in February, there > was only email agreeing that I could find. This matches the in-person > consensus poll I took at BSDcan as well. I think it would take a very > extraordinary set circumstance and severe problems with LUA to change those > plans. For the idiots among us, what's wrong the with FICL-based loader(8) and why is it being replaced with Lua one? ./danfe