From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 8 8:45:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from breg.mc.mpls.visi.com (breg.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0C637B42B for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by breg.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA542D0421; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:44:57 -0600 (CST) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g28Givf02394; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:44:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hawkeyd) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:44:57 -0600 From: D J Hawkey Jr To: Stefan Farfeleder Cc: stable at FreeBSD Subject: Re: My first world build and install Message-ID: <20020308104457.A2368@sheol.localdomain> Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com References: <20020307205848.A1191@sheol.localdomain> <20020308155441.GC271@stefan.fafoe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020308155441.GC271@stefan.fafoe>; from e0026813@stud3.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:54:41PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mar 08, at 04:54 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:58:48PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > > - I see in /usr/lib where several libraries weren't installed: > > libacl, libasn1, libgssapi, libhdb, libkadm, libkadm5clnt, libkadm5srv, > > libkafs, libkdb, libkrb, libkrb5, and libroken. Some look Kerberos > > related, but I can't identify them all. > > > > What did I screw up that they weren't installed? A 'grep' of the > > build log shows they weren't built; why not? > > You have to set MAKE_KERBEROS4 and MAKE_KERBEROS5 to yes in > /etc/make.conf, they are not built by default (see > /etc/defaults/make.conf for other options). I thought I might get bitten by something like this. The Handbook was rather vague, and I (wrongly? badly?) assumed that the "positive" defines in that file were defaulted to "true" or "yes", or were otherwise set up to build and install a system identical to a -RELEASE distribution. Per Chapter 19 of the Handbook, after adding those defines to /etc/make.conf, am I able to build and install the Kerberos-related stuff with cd /usr/src/kerberosIV; make all install and cd /usr/src/kerberos5; make all install or are there dependancies in these trees - or dependancies _on_ these - that dictate I build the whole world [again]? What other defines are required for a "-RELEASE distribution build"? Anyone? If I must re-rebuild the world, I want to get it right this time. > Stefan Farfeleder Thanks for the response, Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message