From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Sep 28 20:36:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896C8E08B3D; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501256D5BD; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxfIc-0001I0-OH; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:20:47 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Mario Lobo" , "Erwan Legrand" Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "FreeBSD questions" Subject: Re: mount_smbfs question (re-post) References: <20170927100635.7b56f8fd@Papi.lobos> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:20:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: bdb49c4ff80bd276e321aade33e76e02752072e2 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Scan-Signature: 1fac81774939798d1cdb19633eb460de X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:36:14 -0000 On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:08:04 +0200, Erwan Legrand wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: >> 2017-09-27 11:20 GMT-03:00 Erwan Legrand : >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Mario Lobo >>> wrote: >>> > Since my environment is tottaly surrounded with shares that no longer >>> > accept SMBv1 (Windows, Linux AND FreeBSD servers), so basically in >>> the >>> > end, what I'm really looking for is a confirmation that I'll just >>> have >>> > to dump all Freebsd samba clients because the OS can't deal with >>> SMBv2 >>> > or above. >>> >>> Perhaps have a look at implementations of SMB on top of FUSE? >>> >>> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=fusefs-smbnetfs >> >> I did. Same problem. >> smbnetfs only works with SMBv1 >> > > It is based on libsmbclient, thus it should support SMB2 if smb.conf > allows it. According to the following thread, the client protocol is > resticted to SMB1 by default: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2016-November/thread.html#116999 > > This might be fixed by setting "client max protocol = SMB2" in > smb.conf. ($HOME/.smb/smb.conf in this case?) I'd suggest setting "client min protocol". ^^^ Regards, Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"