From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May 18 07:51:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA04504
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 07:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA04498
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 May 1996 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.12/1.2) id HAA05190 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Sat, 18 May 1996 07:51:36 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199605181451.HAA05190@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: /usr/adm use
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers)
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 07:51:36 -0700 (MST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings!
     X and at least nas appear to expect /usr/adm for log files.
Is this use deprecated under BSD derivatives?  What would an
appropriate alternative for these be (e.g., /var/log??)
     Thanx!
--don