From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Jul 29 09:47:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA01699 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (castles311.castles.com [208.214.167.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA01654 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:47:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@antipodes.cdrom.com) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antipodes.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03220; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807291646.JAA03220@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu (Kevin Van Maren) cc: rv@plig.net, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP on dual porcessor Compaq In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Jul 1998 10:13:01 MDT." <199807291613.KAA26053@fast.cs.utah.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:46:10 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > My first guess would be this: > > Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags > > 0 0x10 BSP, usable 6 2 1 0x0381 > > 0 0x10 AP, usable 6 3 4 0x80fbff > > You can't have two processors with the same ID. I'd check to see what > the flags mean, too. I'd also be worried about the model mismatch, and the steppings; Intel normally recommend only pairing processors at most one apart from each other in stepping numbers. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message