From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 13 03:58:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA22636 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 13 Mar 1997 03:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA22631 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 1997 03:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id LAA28733; Thu, 13 Mar 1997 11:57:00 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 20:56:59 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Darren Reed cc: ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solaris TPC-C benchmarks (with Oracle) In-Reply-To: <199703130610.GAA26383@parkplace.cet.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Darren Reed wrote: > Did the run Solaris on the same hardware or different hardware ? Sun TPC-C Report ---------------- http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/9703/sunflash.970305.1083.html Solaris (Intel version) IBM 704 PC Server Oracle Universal Server release 7.3.3 Total cost = $88.00/tpmC * 6679.50tpmC = $587,796 Compaq TPC-C Report ------------------- http://www.compaq.com/newsroom/pr/pr211196b.html UnixWare 2.1.1 Compaq ProLiant 5000 Sybase 11 Total cost = $95/tpmC * 8311.43tpmC = $792,738 > Having used a Proliant 2500 which has RAID-5 disk, I assume the 5000 does > too.. I'm sure both configs had as many RAID-5 controllers as could fit in the machine and at least 49 2GB disks and lots of RAM. Umm, let's see what www.tpc.org has ... Compaq ProLiant 4500/133 Model2 c/s 3.0 3516.27 $185 $651,647 Oracle7 v.7.3 UnixWare 2.03 Compaq ProLiant 4500/133 Model2 c/s 3.0 3225.50 $206 $665,806 Oracle7 v.7.3 Solaris v.2.5.1 UnixWare has a little better performance in this older benchmark. Regards, Mike Hancock