From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 21 15: 0:21 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8D64D37B400; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:00:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020221230017.XFUD2951.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:00:17 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA69842;
	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:55:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Benedikt Schmidt <ry102@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>,
	Michael Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>,
	"George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com>,
	freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Debugging over the Ethernet?
In-Reply-To: <20020221221533.GD1449@wn4-marvin.wn4.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202211454450.69443-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Ok, so now George has so many choices to choose from
that I'm expecting 3 different implementations from him, with no common
components :-)


On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:

> Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
> > > > There was a very small TCP/IP stack mentioned on /. the other day; it
> > > > looked close to ideal for this application.
> > > 
> > > though I think it is probably better to use a UDP transport rther than
> > > TCP it would be worth checking it out I guess.
> > 
> > I looked for it, but couldn't find it, going back over
> > a week in the slashdot archives.
> 
> Look at http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/29/2115210&mode=thread.
> The TCP/IP stack mentioned in this article can be found at
> http://dunkels.com/adam/uip/ and is licensed under the 4-clause BSD
> license.
> 
> -- 
> Benedikt
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message