From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 07:31:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE2A907 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4EC31F for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wp18so1403545obc.3 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:31:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QSZWhIGMLHvRCbVHXdtYOgCnzWC9HiYFGhIyAqTZkGg=; b=E4zGjehYJfVhHzTY0p47TUaPoFDQGOlH2e41zS39E9yqv63tsyaQnI2UkLQZABnBu0 V4h7mNp/B66nnjn4xrmPqk/hGGK0UrTv22A1PKBVy3fYL1q+JyRzOntdVLYDqsXFzvNx Mp7F5EUO+ysi4k9pRz3qsIS9jW2eDmshcY5hBIiuymOheZZ/T38n85ihAOd5r+it+cNF r+wFjPaFtdrEIicIOMPzZlgjSYEKNqwMiJYmhAxhPz4m9bREy3+vC71unjP5jypXs5tf 4Dl8dj6qqQmuO+SgoAums4klyKa78dZAOo72hJ+lXhAMOSTDfgJBLVJNeSXKyQzejwir PW4g== X-Received: by 10.182.181.106 with SMTP id dv10mr12172375obc.9.1421479911385; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zhabar.attlocal.net (107-222-186-3.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [107.222.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm2851218obh.4.2015.01.16.23.31.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:31:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:31:45 -0800 From: Justin Hibbits To: Mark Millard Subject: Re: PowerMac G5 quad-core, CPU A1 DIODE TEMP: 90.8 C (for example): How to handle? [more data] Message-ID: <20150116233145.6708cc6f@zhabar.attlocal.net> In-Reply-To: <0631235D-A505-4C37-87D7-6F46A14552AB@dsl-only.net> References: <42CF1E40-5BD5-4B00-86E9-C62AEB9B8B93@dsl-only.net> <15A6D627-9DC7-48AF-B133-94980AFCE46A@dsl-only.net> <20150115231129.1b28c8d0@zhabar.attlocal.net> <0631235D-A505-4C37-87D7-6F46A14552AB@dsl-only.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:31:52 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:08:17 -0800 Mark Millard wrote: > Hi. > > An oddity of the patch is dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm is almost > always zero when sampled: (This was during the "make -j 8 buildworld > buildkernel" sort of test.) > > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3197 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3199 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3197 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 278 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0 > > The b_exhaust and the intakes and the a_pump look more reasonable. > > === > Mark Millard > markmi at dsl-only.net > I think that might be simply a timing issue. I haven't seen any problems testing on my dual G5. How does the temperature look now? Do you still have overheating problems? I have an updated patch available at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1549 , which is what I'm testing on my machine. - Justin