From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 21 13:02:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273E106564A for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD328FC16 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8LD2emP032152; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:02:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <505C6570.8060801@missouri.edu> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:02:40 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" References: <4EF55B2B.9010700@missouri.edu> <20120921044729.GA47944@curry.linta.de> In-Reply-To: <20120921044729.GA47944@curry.linta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn-cur X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:02:42 -0000 On 09/20/2012 11:47 PM, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote: > > Hi, > >> You will have to apply the patch to /usr/src/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm and >> rebuild ctm. (I think "make depend && make && make install" is what you >> need to do.) > > sorry if I missed something, but may I suggest another patch (see attached, > to be applied on top of the other patches). With the change to svn, the > name of the deltas has changed from .gz to .xz, which has the effect that > ctm_rmail no longer finds the missing pieces in the pieces directory so > one would have to apply them by hand... Can you think of a way that ctm_rmail would work in both instances (check both for 4 and 5 digit numbers, and check gz and xz)? I think that is what is needed if the tool is to be universal.