From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 17:56:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C958C1065694; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2D48FC1D; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from besplex.bde.org (c122-107-125-150.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.107.125.150]) by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8UHuRKQ025746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:56:28 +1000 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:56:27 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20090930164612.GJ3130@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: <20091001032216.S3063@besplex.bde.org> References: <200909301634.n8UGYoE6020456@svn.freebsd.org> <20090930164612.GJ3130@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: svn commit: r197647 - in head/sys: amd64/include i386/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:56:30 -0000 On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:34:50PM +0000, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Author: avg >> Date: Wed Sep 30 16:34:50 2009 >> New Revision: 197647 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197647 >> >> Log: >> cpufunc.h: unify/correct style of c extension names >> >> i386 and amd64 archs only. >> inline => __inline. [1] >> __asm__ => __asm. [2] Thanks. >> Reviewed by: kib, jhb [1] >> Suggested by: kib [2] > And this was pointed out to me by Alan Cox. Didn't I complain about it? :-) I complained about the recent deunification of __volatile, but you didn't touch that. Bruce