From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 14 21:16:02 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B191065674;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:16:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from u18-124.dslaccess.de (unknown [194.231.39.124])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678768FC1B;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:16:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.20.1.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [172.20.1.100])
	(Authenticated sender: ohauer)
	by u18-124.dslaccess.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 420C020428;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:15:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DF7CF8E.7000703@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:15:58 +0200
From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
References: <201106141639.p5EGdJ2k003510@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<1308083456.84213.7.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP+JtJWxSGoVTEiOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP+JtJWxSGoVTEiOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UIDs
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:16:02 -0000

On 2011-06-14 22:41, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2011/6/14 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>:
>> Maybe I missed something, but why do we need nobody user here, when we
>> already have it in default master.passwd on every new installation?
>>
>> $ grep nobody /usr/src/etc/master.passwd
>> nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
>>
> 
> Because the code in bsd.port.mk fails if a group is in GROUPS but not GIDs.
> 
> Of course, I realised as you pointed that out that it's unnecessary,
> because the nobody reference isn't in GROUPS, so not parsed by that
> code.
> 
> Should I remove the line in UIDs / GIDs?
> 

I think it's not a bad Idea to have even the default system
users in ports/GIDs ports/UIDs.

For example the following predefined groups are at the moment
not in ports/GIDs
- operator
- mail

But they should go in with this lines to support bacula/postfix/clamav
- operator:*:5:bacula
- mail:*:6:clamav,postfix