From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 00:23:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08F4B60; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E5163F5; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s920NF05036669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:23:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s920NFbI036666; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:23:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:23:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Allan Jude Subject: Re: [Bug 194080] New: handbook should mention svnlite In-Reply-To: <542C8A00.9010805@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <542C8A00.9010805@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:23:15 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 00:23:18 -0000 On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Allan Jude wrote: > I was under the impression svnlite was slated to go away. > > Do we have an actual plan here, to keep it or kill it for 11? As far as documentation is concerned, remember that svnlite is not present before 10.x. To my knowledge, svnlite's presence or future is not currently, er, plan-based.