From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 17 21:30:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9658716A41F for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6370243D45 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8HLUIE0027746 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8HLUIIV027745; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 GMT Message-Id: <200509172130.j8HLUIIV027745@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Juergen Lock Cc: Subject: Re: kern/85993: [panic] emulators/kqemu panics 6.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen Lock List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:30:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/85993; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Juergen Lock To: David Gilbert Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, dgilbert@daveg.ca Subject: Re: kern/85993: [panic] emulators/kqemu panics 6.0-BETA4 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:25:25 +0200 On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 04:02:06PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote: > >>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Lock writes: > > Juergen> Are you using the current port (0.7.2s.20050909)? I got a > Juergen> similar report and in that case it turned out to be an old > Juergen> version of the port. > > [2:34:334]dgilbert@canoe:~> pkg_info | grep qemu > qemu-0.7.2s.20050909 QEMU CPU Emulator > > ... in fact, I recompiled several times to try and break the impass. with WITH_KQEMU defined each time? otherwise you'd be getting hit by a stale kld lying around... (and i can see why that crashes for you, it is missing struct ucred * in the kqemu_clone args on 6.x.)