Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:56:57 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic with fusefs-ntfs on FreeBSD 9 RC1 amd64 Message-ID: <CAJ-FndB=RnkTR2Sbf%2BFA5uJvyjcN5ai7UJXjuxPodvYJYCr9YA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sMiF%2Bm7_68R0SE_m4xPQSsGVmmEJ4jWRmuEP=KHr_LtA@mail.gmail.com> References: <50589DE6.4090107@bsdinfo.com.br> <CAJ-FndA=wFzTBSh8%2BYndGPgPBsF0eYaPngFevjwLNqRe6xfNHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1uA9fQqUuxxLrsKs%2B04oeX_Yq9qY8c85ZYnJSURgLrFhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndB5TO4otMwFXXmnmQHVtJe0p7g=p578jmf3j6yneBjy5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sMiF%2Bm7_68R0SE_m4xPQSsGVmmEJ4jWRmuEP=KHr_LtA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> wrote: >>>>> I installed the package ntfs-fusefs on two different servers and both causes >>>>> kernel panic when trying to copy anything. >>>>> A server using FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE amd64 and the other using FreeBSD 9 RC1 >>>>> amd64. >>>>> Someone is having the same problem? >>>> >>>> Hello Marcelo, >>>> Do you think you can try fuse import explained here: >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036677.html >>>> >>>> The proposed patch is for HEAD@240684 but I'm sure it should apply >>>> cleanly to RELENG_9_1 too. >>>> >>>> Please let me know if you have further questions. >>> >>> I tried patching 9-Stable with fuse_240684.patch. It applied cleanly, >>> but the kernel build failed: >>> cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE >>> -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include >>> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq >>> -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param >>> large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer >>> -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx >>> -mno-sse -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding >>> -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall >>> -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes >>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef >>> -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs >>> -fdiagnostics-show-option -c >>> /usr/src/sys/modules/fuse/../../fs/fuse/fuse_ipc.c >>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >>> /usr/src/sys/modules/fuse/../../fs/fuse/fuse_node.c: In function >>> 'fuse_vnode_setsize': >>> /usr/src/sys/modules/fuse/../../fs/fuse/fuse_node.c:378: warning: >>> passing argument 3 of 'vtruncbuf' makes pointer from integer without a >>> cast >>> /usr/src/sys/modules/fuse/../../fs/fuse/fuse_node.c:378: error: too >>> few arguments to function 'vtruncbuf' >>> *** [fuse_node.o] Error code 1 >>> >>> Looks like something has changed between stable and current that won't >>> work. Any suggestions for a quick fix? >> >> Please check this out: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036862.html > > Attilio, > > stable/9 (r239879) patched and lightly tested. Seems to be working > fine at this time. I still need to further study mount_fusefs and I am > still using the old mount-fuse script until I can look at how HAL and > Gnome will handle things. > > I'll try my rsync test, which reliably crashed the system with the old > fusefs stuff, this weekend. So, did you try this? Any new? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndB=RnkTR2Sbf%2BFA5uJvyjcN5ai7UJXjuxPodvYJYCr9YA>