Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:48:22 -0400 From: Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with setting up a mail server Message-ID: <20100721094822.23e79671@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikAuZ7O_bWGiAGIv1hB1WMJ3Pi0z4KxVdo7oBVI@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100720092644.28643f19aryeh.friedman%gmail.com@flosoft.no-ip.biz> <20100720093328.4f1bd5d0@scorpio> <20100720094609.02f88f0baryeh.friedman%gmail.com@flosoft.no-ip.biz> <AANLkTim0HBZSp2dtajpBOn8LHycClAwFrAH6OU-eLkXb@mail.gmail.com> <20100720165003.42ce7fc7@scorpio> <AANLkTikAuZ7O_bWGiAGIv1hB1WMJ3Pi0z4KxVdo7oBVI@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:54:44 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> articulated: > I doubt anyone makes a choice on an MTA (or any other software) based > on it's RFC-compliance. > In my experience, it's normally boils down to: > > 1. It has the features that I want > 2. I can swim with it in times of toruble Microsoft has been claiming for years that adherence to standards is not a requirement. While they are certainly entitled to their opinion, I would definitely disagree. A quick perusal of http://slashdot.org/ would tend to discredit your remark that, "doubt anyone makes a choice on an MTA (or any other software) based on it's RFC-compliance" statement. As always, selection of tools and their suitability to the task is left up to the end user. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ One man's constant is another man's variable. Alan J. Perlis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100721094822.23e79671>