From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Feb 23 20:57:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABE6AB20B6 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D054EE99 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 7448 invoked by uid 907); 23 Feb 2016 20:57:10 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.101]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:57:10 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Intel Bay Trail support? (Gen 7 graphics, Celeron J1900 CPU) From: Jan Mikkelsen In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:57:11 +1100 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3CD6EAD2-A569-4863-B565-8358C5586AF8@transactionware.com> References: <470ED4D7-B85A-450D-A76B-425AE110D18F@transactionware.com> To: Arto Pekkanen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:57:12 -0000 Hi, Thanks, that=E2=80=99s good to know. Is it reasonable to expect a Bay Trail system to support 1024x768 VESA = with 16 or 24 bit colour depth, and no other acceleration? I=E2=80=99m thinking about how a Bay Trail system would work while = software issues are resolved. Regards, Jan. > On 24 Feb 2016, at 05:02, Arto Pekkanen wrote: >=20 > Since we do not know the exact differences between Bay Trail and Ivy = Bridge, the only safe assumption is that it won't work with FreeBSD = i915kms currently. >=20 > Jan Mikkelsen kirjoitti 23.02.2016 04:42: >> Hi, >> I see from the graphics status page that of the Gen 7 Intel graphics >> chips, Ivy Bridge is supported by Haswell is not. >> Wikipedia* has the Silvermont / ValleyView / Bay Trail as the third >> micro architecture with Gen 7 support, as distinct from Haswell and >> Ivy Bridge. Then this page claims that Bay Trail is an Ivy Bridge >> variant: >> = http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-Bay-Trail.103037.0.html >> Is Bay Trail graphics a Ivy Bridge variant, or does it require = special >> support? Should I expect this to work with 10.2, with the updated = i915 >> driver, or with none of those? >> Thanks >> Jan Mikkelsen, >> *) >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_graphics_processing_units >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > --=20 > Arto Pekkanen