Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:44:09 +0300 From: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS - thanks Message-ID: <cf9b1ee00907110144g3c9bfc5dn911df4a15167e537@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090711084042.GA77702@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20090709112512.GA44158@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <73a41d4b72d62b0bfe3d0fb7206376a8.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <cf9b1ee00907090525t7a337775q71aa01e6a3173de5@mail.gmail.com> <84665df87e93a6ccf24d9837cbc53eba.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <cf9b1ee00907090539i70bf97eq32fe0aa960e9dc52@mail.gmail.com> <20090711084042.GA77702@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Jeremy<peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> wrote: > On 2009-Jul-09 15:39:35 +0300, Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> wrote: >>A single 40 disk raidz (DO NOT DO THIS) will have 40 disks total, 39 >>disks worth of space and will definately explode on you sooner rather >>than later (probably on the first import, export or scrub). > > Can you provide a reference for this statement. =A0AFAIK, the only > reason for the upper recommended limit of 9 disks is performance. > > -- > Peter Jeremy Searching the different FreeBSD mailing lists (which have had discussions about such cases) and googling should yield results. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf9b1ee00907110144g3c9bfc5dn911df4a15167e537>