Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:35:05 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 breaks ports collection Message-ID: <20030323003505.GA31503@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030323002855.GA83375@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20030322225237.GA82960@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20030322234433.GA30963@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030323002855.GA83375@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 04:28:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > I checked src/UPDATING and the freebsd-ports and > freebsd-current mailing lists. There is no entry > or HEADSUP that states the new XFree86 4.3.0 port > has broken the ability to use the ports collections > on all FreeBSD systems with older versions of > XFree86-4 installed. Perhaps, an entry in src/UPDATING > stating that FreeBSD Portmgr is dictating a mandatory > upgrade of XFree86-4 to 4.3.0 is in order. Uhh..the ports collection has NEVER supported using mixed old/new versions of ports. There's nothing new going on here, and portmgr is not "dictating" anything: I'm just explaining reality to you. Kris --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+fQE5Wry0BWjoQKURAvpIAJ9yPFIU3/00O2foI5yacdAE4S3zGACfY83f 5gUvkOQu31XNNey9ZLFT1XQ= =iZ8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030323003505.GA31503>