From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 11:08:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7E016A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F88013C467; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:08:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47987197.2060809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:08:07 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Cederstrand References: <4796C717.9000507@cederstrand.dk> <47972895.4050005@FreeBSD.org> <479745DA.8010003@cederstrand.dk> <20080123193731.K63024@fledge.watson.org> <4797AABE.80509@cederstrand.dk> <20080124085800.zq6aa2cf4k4ogwo8@webmail.leidinger.net> <47986238.4080508@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <47986238.4080508@cederstrand.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Leidinger , performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance Tracker project update X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:08:10 -0000 Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> >> In case you have some space left for more machines, maybe someone is >> willing to help out by sponsoring some. Just tell us how many machines >> you can handle (space/power/...) and if you are interested that we put >> it up on our wantlist. > > I'm sharing an office with 4 others and I'm leaving for Real Work in a > month, so I'm not really in a position to expand at the moment. However, > I'd like to do so later on, and also get a more permanent and reliable > location for the machines. > > After weeding out the worst bugs the system runs pretty much by itself, > but since this is CURRENT there's always the possibility of the slaves > needing attention. I don't see machine availability being a problem once we are ready to "take this live". Kris