From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 22:20:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CE0106566B for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB238FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AA385C24 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:32:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4EE3DA85.4070903@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EE32BB6.3020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4EE38454.3020307@otenet.gr> <4EE3D1F0.60500@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 9.0 install and journaling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:20:28 -0000 On 12/11/11 08:14, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote: > >> GPT is cool - no problems there. The main thing I want to know is if >> I need to run fsck every time the system dies unexpectedly (which is >> a higher occurrence on a laptop)? GJournal helps in that it takes >> care of that. The growing size of drives is another concern given the >> time it takes to check a 500G disk (my smallest atm), although this >> is way down on the list for the moment. > > SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If > something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard fsck. But fsck needs to be run manually- I have users that can't do that, and the filesystem corrupts. Ergo gjournal; it boots up and fixes on the fly. So SU+J needs a manual fsck before booting proper or can it just boot and be done?