From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Feb 23 16:51:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA14049
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA14042;
          Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:51:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA15810; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:50:53 -0800 (PST)
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: mpp@freefall.freebsd.org (Mike Pritchard), henrich@msu.edu,
        freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/2692 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Feb 1997 13:25:59 EST."
             <199702231826.NAA03621@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:50:53 -0800
Message-ID: <15806.856745453@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> this is bogus!  On half of my systems I get three thousand lines everytime th
e
> damn thing runs, obscuring the daily reports.  There should be a way to tell
> find to shut the hell up.  Its not an "illegal" filename, because you can
> create (anyone can create it!) on the filesystm.

I don't like it either, but what do you suggest instead?  Did you adopt
the `-ls' flag suggested by Guido?  If so, was it acceptable?  If not,
do you have another compromise to suggest? :-)

					Jordan