From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 06:48:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC9E37B401 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hexagon.stack.nl (hexagon.stack.nl [131.155.140.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05EA43FE0 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:48:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dean@dragon.stack.nl) Received: by hexagon.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A5DB61C6E; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:48:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dragon.stack.nl (dragon.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5011:207:e9ff:fe09:230]) by hexagon.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8F81C71; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dragon.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1600) id C7B595F19D; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:48:13 +0200 From: Dean Strik To: Craig Rodrigues Message-ID: <20030813134813.GD45711@dragon.stack.nl> References: <20030913030328.GA8097@crodrigues.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030913030328.GA8097@crodrigues.org> X-Editor: VIM Rulez! http://www.vim.org/ X-MUD: Outerspace - telnet://mud.stack.nl:3333 X-Really: Yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about porting KAME IPv6 to CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:48:20 -0000 Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Is anyone actively working on importing the latest IPv6 implementation > from KAME to CURRENT? Not offically anyway, it seems. SUZUKI Shinsuke mentioned his plans on KAME synchronisation: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=577922+582433+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-current/20030608.freebsd-current yet he does consider SCTP to be a late addition. -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli