From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 3 23:25:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2114A16A407 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dleigh@clarence.dylanleigh.net) Received: from ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7B943D58 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dleigh@clarence.dylanleigh.net) Received: from ppp86-151.lns2.mel3.internode.on.net (HELO clarence.dylanleigh.net) ([59.167.86.151]) by ipmail02.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2006 09:54:50 +1030 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CABJcS0U7p1aX/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,386,1157293800"; d="scan'208"; a="40944672:sNHT23556904" Received: by clarence.dylanleigh.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E204EA1061; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:23:39 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:23:39 +1100 From: Dylan Leigh To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061103232339.GA14349@clarence.dylanleigh.net> References: <45475298.5090709@inoc.net> <53f158630611021112n2307fdael4ff860cee6e1ac58@mail.gmail.com> <20061103083331.GA854@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061103083331.GA854@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Author-Webpage: http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~dleigh Subject: Re: 6.x from i386 to amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:25:01 -0000 On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:33:31PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, 2006-Nov-02 11:12:43 -0800, David Marshall wrote: > > More importantly for us, it's impossible to build a 32-bit > > perl on the amd64, and we don't need a 64-bit perl. Our > > apache/mod_perl servers are 3X bigger on the amd64, and that > > is unsatisfactory. > > In most cases, an amd64 executable will be larger than an i386 > executable. I'm surprised that you've found such a big > difference. > I also found a threefold increase in the memory footprint of apache/mod_php/mod_perl when I switched from i386 to amd64. From what I've read this isn't unheard of on 64 bit linux/apache/php. Most other applications tend to be slightly larger on amd64.