From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 14 4:31: 2 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6856D37B402 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:30:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:44920 "HELO ertr1013.student.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with SMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:30:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 1941 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Jan 2001 12:30:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:30:19 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20010114133018.A1918@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <28586.979469127@critter> <200101141115.f0EBFBQ89810@mobile.wemm.org> <20010114130017.A1612@student.uu.se> <20010114040933.A35126@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010114040933.A35126@dragon.nuxi.com>; from TrimYourCc@NUXI.com on Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 04:09:33AM -0800 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 04:09:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:00:17PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > I don't agree. Removing 386 support from GENERIC I can live with (although I > > don't like it much) but removing 386 support entirely would be a bad idea > > IMNSHO. > > I don't have any experience with -current but -stable works fine on 386 and > > Please try -current on a i386 before voicing an opinion. I don't know > why you think experience with one counts for the other. > > -stable and -current are now very different beasts. > src/release/scripts/dokern.sh (which strips things out of the GENERIC > kernel for the boot floppy) cuts out a lot more on -current than -stable. Point taken. I was mainly (knee-jerk) reacting to the statements that a 386 was unsuitable for running anything above 2.2.x which is not true. (Note to self: Think things through a bit more before replying next time.) Alright, there might be good reasons to drop 386 support from -current. I don't like it, but I can live with it. Just remember to change all the places that refer to 'i386' as the generic name for the architecture if the 386 itself is dropped. :-) -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message