From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu May 10  0: 4:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7838937B423; Thu, 10 May 2001 00:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roam@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from roam@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4A74mY36161;
	Thu, 10 May 2001 00:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roam)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 00:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: <roam@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200105100704.f4A74mY36161@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: roam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, dinoex@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/27243: exec command may fail due to incorect use of mkstemp().
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: exec command may fail due to incorect use of mkstemp().

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->dinoex
Responsible-Changed-By: roam
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 10 00:04:14 PDT 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer; the patch in the PR seems almost good enough,
though I guess it could use an snprintf() or strlcpy() :)

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27243

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message