From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 22:47:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49FA16A400 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4291043D53 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:47:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so881780wxc for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:47:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QTZ8/gUM5IB1z9A1yt1me8nnGNFsMM9pH9fUzCuH0rLygA+h3xrmpLrviXI3Nu0+3JCCUtoVXPex1l9NjiioGNMRZHtdHaf5/IEtYZS6tZvw61LwbCyt2prwFKUjo66mkP3cp5TDADcRWZphZ6A5sujjjQ8hSCnmX4s2sUarykM= Received: by 10.70.43.8 with SMTP id q8mr5696809wxq; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.13 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:47:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:47:48 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Using /dev/adX instead of adXc or adXe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:47:49 -0000 On 3/13/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > What's wrong with "newfs /dev/ad1" "mount /dev/ad1 /mnt" > and using it? The disk will never be used as bootable, and > will never be installed in a non-bsd computer. It's just there > for storage. > > So is there a caveat? I've heard of it being done accidently with no ill effects, and I've done it under qemu with no ill effects. It makes me feel better to have some abstraction WRT disks, I've tended to use glabel(8) for handling this. -- --