Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Aug 1995 05:42:53 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rm -rf ${WRKDIR} in do-extract 
Message-ID:  <22510.809700173@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Aug 1995 04:35:57 PDT." <199508291135.EAA14810@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The only reason I can think of it is (since we are here, there sure
> isn't a work/.extract_done) to safeguard against the case when the
> previous extraction failed in the middle and left a half-baked work/

That's correct.

> subdirectory.  If that's the case, it (and the following "mkdir work"
> line) should probably move to the main "extract" target, these are
> "meta" stuff (just like the cookies) that the do-* targets shouldn't
> have to worry about....

I agree - this was poorly designed initially.  Go for it!

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22510.809700173>